Sunday, December 21, 2014

Roman Army

https://docs.google.com/a/student.egsd.net/document/d/1BR7loFxt6qiuIe-S3axyPIhfiFXxspu1UhWT58Lep-Q/edit

Over their history, the Romans faced off against a plethora of enemies who used widely varying tactics. They were forced to improvise to defeat their foes on many occasions. Due to this improvisation, the Romans would have been ready to defeat any number of unknown foes. This raises the question, how would the Romans have dealt with fantasy armies, or armies that emerged too late for them to fight. To answer this question, one must analyze Roman tactics, and the tactics of those they never faced.


The Roman army fought in an organized fashion, which allowed them to defeat their early unorganized enemies. They used a modified version of the Greek Phalanx, which gave them infantry power, but more mobility. They used javelins and stabbing swords, but rarely used bows, and placed little importance in cavalry. The Romans would first throw their Javelins in battle and then march forwards in an organized fashion, driving back the enemy. Other tactics included the tortoise (pictured above), which kept the Romans safe from ranged attackers.

The Imperial Walkers, seen in The Empire Strikes Back, were siege machines used by the empire to attack fortified rebel positions. These monstrosities were used in a similar fashion to elephants, as a shock weapon, as well as massive army breaking weapon. They could fire long distances, but had little mobility, and were very slow. This allowed the rebel alliance to eliminated them at the Battle of Hoth by flanking and surrounding them.

The Orc armies in The Hobbit were similar in nature to the barbarian armies the Romans faced during the early empire. The orcs had an overall strategy, but little organization after the battle began. They charged en mass at their enemies, and would attempt to fight individual soldiers on the enemy side. Some more complex tactics used by the orcs included attacking a city left undefended, and use of flying creatures to harass their enemies from above. The orcs used overwhelming numbers to their advantage when at all possible, in addition to surprise tactics.


Finally, the Viking armies of the middle ages used raiding tactics to harass the European coastline. This allowed them to terrorize the continent for hundreds of years. They would raid unprotected areas like monasteries, and then dissapear back into the sea. On land, the Vikingsused a shield wall to protect their forces, similar to Roman tortoise tactics.

Sources
"Viking Weapons and Warfare." BBC News. BBC, n.d. Web. 21 Dec. 2014.
The Empire Strikes Back. Dir. Irvin Kershner. By Leigh Brackett and Lawrence Kasdan. Perf. Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, and Billy Dee Williams. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, 1980.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. Warner Brothers UK, 2014. Film.
Watkins, Jack, ed. The Encyclopedia of Classical Warfare. N.p.: Metro, 2011. Print.
Santon, Kate, and Liz McKay, eds. Atlas of World History. N.p.: Parragon, 2011. Print.

10 comments:

  1. Such great post. Much picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, brohan.

      Delete
    2. Anyways I enjoy your article very much. It's so cool how you sited Star Wars and the Hobbit as sources. I would have never seen the connection between the two

      Delete
    3. One is in the "fantasy" genre and one is in the "science-fantasy" genre. If you think about it, that is 1/2 of the words shared! By the way, brohan, have some Tengwar: http://tengwar.art.pl/tengwar/ott/obrazek.php?f=p&s=20&t=szFFIGlUIHFVIDU2UjIgaixVNlKu.

      Delete
  2. I really like your Lord of the Rings comparison, it makes me think that a lot of aspects of Lord of the Rings combat is mildly realistic. What other aspects of Roman warfare is comparative to Lord of the Rings?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not LORT, but the Hill Dwarves that Thorin Oakenshield called to defend Erebor used a wall tactic which was similar to both the Roman Tortoise and the Viking shield wall.

      Delete
    2. Your allusions are really cool, but I think you need to explain the relationships between them better

      Delete
  3. What were the differences between the Roman phalanx and the Greek version?

    ReplyDelete
  4. From someone who has never really been a fan of lord of the rings and the hobbit I really think that I learned a lot from your post and it was a well done job.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like your comparisons to Star Wars and Lord of the Rings. How would you compare the roman army to the modern American army?

    ReplyDelete